Legal counsel for NSW Police Commissioner Mal Lanyon has preemptively rejected a watchdog’s critique of the police response to a woman’s fatal bashing, arguing officers were subject to “unfair public attack”.
Lindy Lucena was killed by her partner, Robert Huber, less than 600 meters from a police station in Ballina on January 3, 2023. It took police nearly an hour to respond to the Triple Zero call stating a man was “bashing the hell out of his woman”.
The call was incorrectly categorised as a “concern for welfare” report rather than the higher category of assault, and was broadcast only three times in half an hour, instead of in 60 seconds as required.
When officers arrived, they didn’t exit their vehicles, driving past Lucena as she lay dead or dying. Police in the region were stretched thin on a busy night with inadequate staffing levels.
Her body was discovered five hours later, after Huber handed himself into police. He has since been convicted of manslaughter.
The police watchdog, the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission, investigated the case following a complaint from Greens MP Sue Higginson. Hearings concluded in December.
In a submission to the watchdog on behalf of Lanyon ahead of the commission’s final report, barrister Tim Smartt argued the commission should “vindicate police”.
He argued that officers did their best under “trying circumstances” and should not be “publicly maligned.”
“There is no public interest in the community being misled about the conduct of police,” he wrote.
Smartt’s submission also said the watchdog should “be more careful” in its language to avoid giving the impression Lucena’s life could have been saved had police acted differently.
At Huber’s manslaughter trial, one expert said Lucena probably died at 7.20pm, about half an hour before police reached the scene, while another testified she died about 9.30pm.
“[The watchdog] should avoid language like ‘a missed opportunity’ to describe the result of the search that was done,” he wrote.
Smartt’s submission dismissed the watchdog’s proposed reforms, arguing police were already aware of resourcing issues; that the incident was already addressed in existing reviews, and there was no value in extra training, guideline revision, database modification or voluntary information for an incident as “idiosyncratic as this one”.
“The cost of implementing the recommendations outweighs any benefit,” he wrote.
Finally, Smartt’s submission argued against a “critical incident” finding, claiming that because such a ruling increases the watchdog’s own powers, it creates an “appearance of a conflict of interest”. A critical incident declaration triggers an independent police investigation.
Anyone needing support can contact 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732), National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028, Lifeline 13 11 14, and Kids Helpline 1800 55 1800.
Start the day with a summary of the day’s most important and interesting stories, analysis and insights. Sign up for our Morning Edition newsletter.
Amber Schultz is a crime and justice reporter with The Sydney Morning Herald.Connect via X or email.
Jessica McSweeney is a reporter at The Sydney Morning Herald covering urban affairs and state politics.Connect via email.
